The evening before last, I was idly watching the TV whilst eating my tea of stewed apples (kindly donated by one of my neighbours) and custard when I stumbled into a programme called ‘Amazing Spaces’ This programme focuses upon innovative types of new buildings and this week was concentrating upon what is called the ‘Small Home’. Apparently, if one can build a structure that will fit on the back of a trailer and is therefore relocatable, one does not need planning permission. One of the cases highlighted was that of a university lecturer who had a small home built by a specialist firm and eventually featured both a living room, kitchen, bedroom and bathroom and was excellently fitted out with a variety of beautifully chosen fixtures and fittings. This had been acquired on a small mortgage which would be paid off in six years and was going to be relocated to her parent’s residence in Solihull where they could find space for it. The other case was even more remarkable and featured a young lad of only 17 years of age. He lived on a farm and had acquired from somewhere a huge disused container which he set about converting to his home. He started with a budget of £5,000 and actually completed his project under budget. In general terms, he managed to get hold of materials that would otherwise be thrown away – for example, he heard of someone who has having their kitchen refitted who were more than happy to let him have their discarded kitchen carcasses which would otherwise, I suppose, just gone to landfill. Like the other person featured in the film, the internal fittings were of a most innovative nature and his parents had found him a location on their family farm where the trailer/home could be located. One has to presume that in both these cases, one needed a nearby water supply but apart from this, one could only marvel how enterprising and indeed cheaply, these young people had housed themselves. But such innovations have been seen before in British society. Where I lived in Starbeck, near Harrogate, in the 1950’s some people had acquired a railway carriage and converted this into a home. Historical accounts note that thousands of disused carriages were repurposed across Britain—particularly during the interwar period in the 1930s. While an exact aggregate count does not exist, specific regional concentrations and site numbers have been recorded by railway historians. Dozens of Victorian and Edwardian carriages were hauled onto the beach front in Shoreham-by-Sea from the late 19th century through 1918 to form permanent dwellings and holiday homes. In the 1930s, nearly 300 bungalows were constructed in Pagham, Sussex, using pairs of retired railway carriages as a structural foundation or core. Following a 1920s initiative by Southern Railway allowing workers to purchase surplus rolling stock, roughly 30 carriage-homes came to populate the shingle beach in Dungeness, Kent. Turning to the case of the prefabricated houses built at the end of the second World War, taking the details of the public housing plan from the output of the Burt Committee formed in 1942, the wartime coalition government under Churchill proposed to address the need for an anticipated 200,000 shortfall in post-war housing stock, by building 500,000 prefabricated houses, with a planned life of up to 10 years, within five years of the end of the Second World War. The Housing (Temporary Accommodation) Act 1944 aimed to deliver 300,000 units within 10 years, within a budget of £150 million. Through use of the wartime production facilities and creation of common standards developed by the Ministry of Works, the programme got off to a good start and, of 1.2 million new houses built between 1945 and 1951 when the programme officially ended, 156,623[1] prefab houses were constructed. Today, a number survive, a testament to the durability of a series of housing designs and construction methods only envisaged to last 10 years. On the back of this scheme, local authorities developed non-traditional building techniques, which included some prefabrication, notably pre-cast reinforced concrete (PRC), to fulfil the underestimated demand. Now I remember seeing some pre-fab houses as part of the urban landscape when I moved to Leicester in 1971 which was 15 years beyond their allocated life span of ten years and, by all accounts, people found them comfortable and grew quite attached to them. Some of these may well survive to this very day. Because thousands of these temporary post-war homes were built across Britain in the 1940s and have been taken down in piecemeal local redevelopment projects over the decades, there is no single ‘last ever’ recorded demolition date for the entire UK. Thousands of units have vanished gradually, while roughly 8,000 prefabs are estimated to still survive today, with a small number holding official listed building status (such as those on Birmingham’s Wake Green Road and London’s Excalibur Estate). In the Birmingham case, 2,428 prefabs still survive and these temporary homes were only expected to be in use for ten years but 70 years on they are still in use. As Meg and I were completing our undergraduate degree in 1968, a lot of the old terraced housing in Hulme behind the university was in the process of being torn down. Built between 1968 and 1972 to replace old Victorian slums, the Hulme Crescents provided over 3,000 deck-access homes. Architects used an ‘streets in the sky’ layout, featuring wide concrete walkways running past front doors to build a friendly neighbourhood feel. But the massive concrete blocks suffered from severe damp, leaking roofs, cockroach and mouse infestations, and poor construction. Crime went up, lifts broke, and the area became a dangerous no-go zone. By 1984, conditions were so bad that the council stopped charging rent for them. Government funding allowed Manchester City Council to tear down the complex starting in 1993, and the structures were completely gone by 1995. So this ‘new’ housing only lasted about 25 years and no doubt Manchester will be paying for the construction of the deck access homes for decades to come even though they have had to be swept away.
In the morning, I attended the CAMEO (= ‘Come And Meet Each Other’) fortnightly meeting put on at the Methodist Centre for the bereaved. Of the forty of us there must have been about four males and the women seemed to be in long established friendship groups, many having been widowed for between about 15 years. We had quite an interesting talk on a bus route that runs around the Birmingham suburbs and it was lavishly illustrated with photographs of important houses, factories and eminent people that could be found along the route. Most of the historic pubs and factories had been pulled down to be replaced by housing. After I returned home, I made myself a curry out of onions, peppers, tomatoes, left over scraps of ham and eventually served after the addition of the curry powder with a dollop of kefir yogurt. It was quite a fine afternoon and I knew that the front grassed area was crying out to be cut and although I did feel particularly energetic before starting the job, I knew that it had to be done. The back lawn is easier and can wait for a couple days more. Soup making beckons in the late afternoon but only after I had a rest after the lawn cutting.