Yesterday did feel a lot colder when I leapt out of my bed at 6.45 conscious of the fact that there were several domestic jobs, not least the clothes washing that needed to be done. But as I eschew ironing in all of its manifestations, I always buy shirts these days which used to be called ‘drip dry’ but the modern terminology used, I believe by Marks and Spencer, is ‘Easy Care’ which means that once I take them out of the dryer they are pretty crease free. I then hang them over the back of a chair in the kitchen to encourage the few remaining creases to drop out and then transfer them to our drying room (a magnificent little room near to my upstairs bedroom which is always warm because it houses a large hot water cylinder as part of out ‘Combi’ domestic heating system and it is excellent to give clothes their final drying off). I also store my towels and sheets on the wooden shelving in this little room and it is one of the really good features of this house which I would sadly miss if and when I move elsewhere.
In the House of Commons yesterday the Home Secretary gave a barn-storming performance when she announced a radical change of policy to overcome the ‘migrants boats’ crisis. She also used the most unparliamentary language telling the Reform party leader, Nigel Farage to ‘sod off’- she may have been asked by the speaker to withdraw this unparliamentary language but once uttered the impact (and the political damage) has already been done. But it is fair comment to add that the change in policy announced by Shabana Mahmood contain sweeping changes to the UK’s asylum system, including rowing back on guarantees of financial support. The tough proposals have been welcomed by the Tories and Reform and left some Labour MPs feeling uneasy. Ms Mahmood announced a new direction in Labour’s plan to crack down on asylum seekers. The ‘restoring order and control’ plan includes
– The removal of more families with children – either voluntarily through cash incentives up to £3,000, or by force
– Quadrupling the time successful asylum seekers must wait to claim permanent residency in the UK, from five years to 20
– Removing the legal obligation to provide financial support to asylum seekers, so those with the right to work but choose not to will receive no support
– Setting up a new appeals body to significantly speed up the time it takes to decide whether to refuse an asylum application
– Reforming how the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) is interpreted in immigration cases;
– Banning visas for countries refusing to accept deporteesAnd the establishment of new safe and legal refugee routes.
The parliamentary arithmetic is going to be interesting here. Although the `Labour party after its huge election victory has a majority of about 148 seats, there is bound to be a huge rebellion particularly from those newly elected MPs representing constituencies in the North and Midlands where the majorities are small and there is a higher concentration of ethnic minority voters (more sympathetic to the plight of illegal immigrants). Actually, although the term ‘illegal immigrants’ is in widespread use across the whole of the political spectrum, including the Labour party, it is not technically accurate. The term ‘illegal immigrant’ is inaccurate and misleading because no human being is illegal; rather, they may be undocumented or have ‘irregular’ status. Many people are in a country without legal authorisation due to complex immigration systems, visa overstays, or seeking asylum, which are not always a result of criminal intent. For example, someone who enters on a valid visa and overstays is considered to have an ‘irregular’ status, not an ‘illegal’ one. But politicians of all political colours continue to use the term ‘illegal’ because it strikes a chord with large swathes of the electorate.
I was just about well and truly up and some of my early morning routines undertaken when my son called around and we exchanged news of or various social activities and comings-and-goings over the last few days. It was good to see him as we had been in contact for a few days but later in the week he is going to visit some of his wife’s relatives and sometime after, he and my daughter-in-law both a brief holiday booked in Spain. He had not departed for very long when my Droitwich friend called around and whilst she worked on he laptop I got myself properly up and dressed. Then my friend worked a little on her laptop, we chatted a lot and then made ourselves a brunch based on eggs. One of my friend’s saucepans had completely come to a natural end and was only fit to be thrown away but fortunately, I have in stock some none-stick saucepans which are rarely used so I was happy to donate some of these excess pans to a home where they would be used extensively. Then my friend and I both had to dash off, she to her yoga class and me to my Pilates class but no doubt we can snatch a (cooking together) opportunity in a few days’ time. After I returned from my Pilates class, I made myself a quick lunch opening a tin of lamb and vegetable soup (more like a stew actually) which made for a quick lunch. After lunch, I unintentionally started to watch one of those ‘Escape to the Country’ programmes much beloved of afternoon TV producers. But this aroused my curiosity because a couple were looking for cottages in and around the small villages in and around Harrogate in North Yorkshire which was the area in which I grew up and therefore knew reasonably well. Some of the cottages were stunning and were generally furnished very tastefully to reflect modern styles. Although the programme presenters always tease the audience and the potential viewers/buyers with the revelation of the asking price, I was amazed to discover that some bijou cottages were actually on the market for anything up to £100k less than I thought they were worth. Prices of houses have risen sharply in what is termed the ‘Golden Triangle’ of York, Leeds and Harrogate but perhaps the houses on the TV programme were slightly outside this ‘Golden Triangle’ but you can see what couple from London are tempted to buy because the price might be one quarter that they would have to pay in the London area.