It looks as though the peace deal, or at least the first stage of it, is proceeding in the midst of some cautious optimism. Both sides have a vested interest in letting the deal go ahead – the Palestinians evidently want a ceasefire and for the aid trucks to increase rapidly in quantity whilst the Israelis are desperate to get their hostages back, now that Gaza has been bombed to the ground and Hamas practically obliterated as a fighting force. Donald Trump is reported is preparing to fly to the Middle East as the hostages may well be returned to Israel on Monday in three days’ time and Trump is desperate that the worlds press has him centre stage taking the credit for the release of the hostages. Once the hostages have been returned, the Palestinian prisoners released and the Israeli army withdrawn somewhat in Gaza, the really hard part of the peace process will start. The most important tasks will be the reconstruction of Gaza society, both in terms of a government and also the infrastructure. But it looks as though the plans to create a government of sorts will include a committee with Donald Trump at its head and including Tony Blair (who is reviled in the region for his support of the invasion of Iraq) It seems inconceivable that we have a government that does not include any Palestinians but that is the situation as of today. In ongoing ceasefire negotiations, Hamas has demanded the release of key Palestinian leaders held in Israeli prisons. Among them is Marwan Barghouti, a prominent figure seen by many Palestinians as a symbol of unity and resistance. Hamas says freeing these leaders is essential for any lasting peace deal, while Israel remains cautious over releasing high-profile detainees. So we have an evident ‘leader in waiting’ who is kept in gaol. The British, though, have quite a good history or keeping in gaol individuals who went on to become outstanding international leaders. Both Gandhi and Kenyatta were imprisoned multiple times during their leadership roles against colonial powers. Gandhi was repeatedly imprisoned in both South Africa and India for his activism in leading the independence movements, while Kenyatta was imprisoned by the British from 1954 to 1961 for his involvement in Kenyan independence efforts. And the outstanding example is, of course, Nelson Mandela, who was kept in gaol for some 27 years by the South Africans.
Returning our attention to the UK., figures have just been released showing the average costs of residential care for the infirm and elderly. In the West Midlands, the costs have risen to £1200 a week whereas in the prosperous South East, the figure rises to £1450 and approximately half of the residents are paying for themselves by using the capital ‘locked up’ in their homes which are having to be sold to pay for their care. This has happened four times in the case of my own family and families connected by marriage and in practically every case, the old person in question has lived just long enough for the entire worth of the house to be spent before their own demise. The West Germans have an incredibly sensible system to cope with the increasing costs of old age. Using a German-style 2.5% levy on income for over-40s, split between employer and employee contributions ring-fenced for social care, would raise £15bn annually but we seem reluctant, as a society, to adopt this or a similar solution. I always find it both amazing, and also depressing, that the UK does not utilise research teams to study other European societies to see ‘what works’. Insofar as we import social models, these sometimes seems to take America as their model (and the British Tory party seems as though it wishes to emulate the much derided American model of ‘ICE’, ICE refers to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, a government agency responsible for enforcing immigration laws within the United States by locating, detaining, and deporting undocumented immigrants and targeting criminal activities that support these organisations. The agency was created in response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks and is the largest investigative arm of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). But in practice, this is often subcontracted out to the private sector in which masked men with no ID visible (as would be the case for a police officer in the UK) are seizing people almost at random off the streets of large cities in the USA.
Mid-morning, I made a journey to Worcester by train to meet up with an old near-neighbour from my Winchester days. We discovered by accident that we were both living in different parts of Worcestershire so we chose a coffee bar near to the station which was equidistant for us both and where we could catch up on old times. Then we popped around the corner to a little square that served light mid-day meals and carried on our long conversation there. So, this made for an interesting day out for both of us and made for a very different Friday. After I had returned home, I received a text from one my Saturday morning friends that we meet in a slightly different coffee bar for our coffee tomorrow to make the journey a little easier for one of our number – there are now so many coffee bars along the High Street from which we can choose so we thought we try out a different one.
We all know that Donald Trump has been openly lobbying to be awarded the Nobel peace prize for his ‘role’ in the resolution of the Gaza crisis. But Venezuelan opposition leader and pro-democracy campaigner Maria Corina Machado has won the Nobel Peace Prize. The committee praised her for her ‘tireless work promoting democratic rights… and for her struggle to achieve a just and peaceful transition from dictatorship to democracy’. It said she had resisted death threats and been forced into hiding in her fight against President Nicolas Maduro – widely considered a dictator.’ When authoritarians seize power, it is crucial to recognise courageous defenders of freedom who rise and resist,’ Nobel added. The committee said Ms Machado had stayed in Venezuela despite personal risk, calling it a ‘choice that has inspired millions of people Democracy depends on people who refuse to stay silent, who dare to step forward despite grave risk,’ it said. Apart from the sheer logistics of awarding a prize to Donald Trump when we are only a day or so into the process and all could still unravel, one wonders whether the Nobel prize Committee were indirectly making a point to Donald Trump and the rest of the MAGA movement about the sort of people who are deserving of the Peace prize?